Fi rst, in a departure from traditional insider trading principles. The second circuit in newman stressed repeatedly that the circumstances surrounding a stock tip can be sufficient to inform a trader that the stock tip came from an insider who breached a duty of confidentiality in return for a personal benefit. Second circuit expands scope of insidertrading liability. Feb 21, 2020 the second circuit upheld the convictions, agreeing with the government that prosecutors need not prove the traditional elements of insider trading unless they charge that offense under the exchange act. Sec, the united states court of appeals for the second circuit affirmed an insider trading conviction without proof of a personal benefit to the insider or tipper. Whereas title 15 insider trading cases require a personal benefit to the tipper and knowledge thereof. A federal appeals court overturned two insider trading convictions in a closely watched case that could make it harder for prosecutors to prove the crime. Second circuit confirms easier path to insider trading. Newman and altered the standard for determining whether the personal benefit element of insider trading has been satisfied. Second circuit makes it easier for the doj to bring criminal. Second circuit holds that a personal benefit is not required for insider. Supreme court have created some uncertainty concerning the.
An insider trading case heads to the supreme court the. Blaszczak potentially makes it easier to prosecute insider trading cases by ruling the government doesnt need to prove an insider. Court upholds insider trading conviction of money manager. And in affirming the use of these statutes to charge insider trading, the second circuit also held that when prosecuting cases using these statutes the government did not need to prove some of the elements it has to prove when it prosecutes insider trading the traditional way, as a violation of rule 10b5. Martoma, issued on august 23, 2017, the court walked back much of what it said, just three years earlier, on what is required to prove a personal benefit in insider trading cases involving individuals who provide material, nonpublic information tippers to. Jan 15, 2020 the second circuits recent decision in u. Jan 21, 2020 an important 2nd circuit opinion on insider trading was rushed out on december 30, 2019. Newman and expanded the scope of insider trading liability. Blaszczak, four men were charged with participating in an insider trading scheme. The united states attorneys office in the southern district of new york had compiled a remarkable streak of more than eighty insider trading convictions over the past five years. Dec 16, 2014 last week, the united states court of appeals for the second circuit issued a longanticipated ruling dismissing with prejudice indictments against two insider trading defendants in united states v. On june 25, 2018, the second circuit amended its opinion in united states v.
Second circuit provides easier path for criminal insider. Court of appeals for the second circuit may overhaul the way insidertrading cases are charged and litigated, metlitsky and turner wrote. Martoma, an insider trading case that has received significant attention as a vehicle to clarify the personal benefit element of tippee liability in insider trading cases in the second circuit. Jan 22, 2020 while this new development is applicable only to criminal cases rather than to civil or enforcement actions, the second circuit has made it easier for prosecutors to obtain insider trading. Blaszczak personal benefit test does not apply to title 18 insider trading cases. A recent opinion by the united states court of appeals for the second circuit has also paved the way for the doj to more easily meet its burden of proof in future insider trading cases. He twice asked the appellate court to throw out his conviction for insider trading from his criminal case. Second circuit makes it easier for the doj to bring. An important 2nd circuit opinion on insider trading was rushed out on december 30, 2019. On december 30, 2019, the second circuit issued a consequential insider trading decision in united states v. Insider trading prosecutions were hollow at the core 2nd.
The second circuit lowers the standard for proving title 18 insider trading, making it easier for the government to bring insider trading cases where there is no personal benefit to the insider who discloses information. Blaszczak, decided on december 30, 2019, the court held that the personalbenefit testa judgemade rule that the government must prove a tipper expected to receive some benefit in exchange for disclosing confidential informationdoes not apply to insider. Insider trading prosecutions streamlined by the second circuit. Divided second circuit panel overrules prior newman insider. The expanded insider trading toolkit bestowed by the second circuit is only available in criminal prosecutions, as title 18 is limited to criminal cases. On december 30, 2019, the second circuit issued an opinion in united states v. Insufficient evidence calls for overturning insider trading cases, second circuit rules. Second circuit court of appeals expands insider trading liability. Scotus history backs 2nd circuit insider trading opinion in.
Insidertrading cases, whether civil or criminal, have traditionally. Karp discuss the courts recent decision in united states v. Second circuit court of appeals expands insider trading. Jul 17, 2015 the first day of august is the justice departments deadline for asking the u. The second circuit upheld the convictions, agreeing with the government that prosecutors need not prove the traditional elements of insider trading unless they charge that offense under the exchange act. May 03, 2015 it stated, the sec has litigated numerous insider trading claims in this circuit where the only personal benefit to the tipper apparent from the decisions was providing inside information to a friend, that an even larger number of cases had been settled on that basis, and that the panels narrowed benefit standard could limit the. Apr, 2020 on april 10, 2020, the united states court of appeals for the second circuit denied the defendants petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc in united states v. Moreover, until any such appeals are decided, the government may be reluctant to rely solely on 18 u. Four defendants convicted in a 2018 insider trading trial have asked the 2nd u. Sec2 for insider trading cases under section 10b of the securities exchange act title 15 securities fraud also applies to tipping schemes.
This decision therefore potentially expands federal prosecutors ability to criminally charge insider trading cases, with title 18 charges as a different, and potentially more flexible, vehicle to pursue such conduct. Second circuit ruling could significantly affect how the. In doing so, the court overturned part of united states v. Divided second circuit panel overrules prior newman. Sep 07, 2017 on august 23, 2017, in united states v. Antonia apps and katherine goldstein on thursday, nov. The second circuit sets new hurdles for insider trading. Jan, 2020 the second circuit has made it easier for federal prosecutors to bring insidertrading cases. Blaszczak, prosecutors appear to have an easier task sustaining insider trading cases under alternatives to title 15 requirements. In newman, the second circuit overturned a new york district courts convictions of two portfolio managers. Aug 23, 2017 court upholds insider trading conviction of money manager.
Second circuit confirms easier path to insider trading convictions. Notable insider trading decision affirmed, despite asserted. This will present evidentiary difficulties for prosecutors in successfully pursuing alleged insider trading cases. Martoma, the united states court of appeals for the second circuit overruled its own 2014 decision in united states v.
These holdings heighten the risks of criminal prosecution in insider trading cases where there is limitedtono evidence of a direct or indirect. Circuit court of appeals, prosecutors must prove both that the tipster received a personal benefit from leaking confidential information and that those who traded on the information knew of the benefit. Overturning the criminal convictions of former diamondback capital management, llc portfolio manager, todd newman, and former level global investors, l. The second circuit clears the path for insider trading. The second circuit ruled today that a meaningfully close personal relationship is not required for insider trading liability where a tipper discloses inside information as a gift or in exchange for some other type of nonpecuniary personal benefit.
Personal benefit in title 18 insider trading cases new. For the first time since the supreme courts 1983 decision in dirks v. Blaszczak may have made the prosecution of insider trading significantly easier by ruling that the government is not required to prove that an insider received any personal benefit in exchange for sharing material, nonpublic information with a trader when the crime is charged under the wire fraud and securities fraud statutes in. In a recent decision, the second circuit in united states v. The decision substantially expands the scope of insider trade liability in tipping cases. Divided second circuit panel overrules prior newman insider trading decision. Salman relied on a 2014 decision from the united states court of appeals for the second circuit, in manhattan, united states v. Blaszczak may have made the prosecution of insider trading significantly easier by ruling that the government is not required to prove that an insider received any personal benefit in exchange for sharing material, nonpublic information with a trader when the crime is charged under the wire fraud and securities fraud.
Jan 21, 2020 while this new development is applicable only to criminal cases rather than to civil or enforcement actions, the second circuit has made it easier for prosecutors to obtain insider trading convictions. Blaszczak that raises the investigative and prosecutorial risk in certain types of insider trading cases in two significant respects. Jan 02, 2020 the second circuit held earlier this week that the criminal statute proscribing securities fraud permits convictions for insider trading without proof that the provider of material, nonpublic information received a personal benefit in exchange for that information, even though proof of a personal benefit would be required under the general securitieslaw statute prohibiting insider trading. Blaszczak may signal a change in how prosecutors in the second circuit, and perhaps in other jurisdictions, pursue insider trading cases. Feb 26, 2015 the most interesting amicus brief in the governments landmark appeal of a december 2014 ruling by the 2nd u.
Aug 23, 2017 in december 2014, the 2nd circuit, whose jurisdiction includes wall street, overturned two insider trading convictions in u. The court upheld his conviction both times in 20 and 2018. Second circuit endorses new criminal theory for insider. Historical requirement of a personal benefit to prove insider trading. May 24, 2011 the 2nd circuit court of appeals might be addressing this question in the galleon insider trading case say the attorneys for galleon founder, raj rajaratnam. Two aspects of the decision are particularly important. Court overturns 2 insider trading convictions usa today.
Newman, that made it harder to prosecute insider trading cases. Prosecutors have a stronger hand going after insider trading following a court ruling that lowered the bar for bringing cases. According to reuters, however, many legal pundits and experts are saying that rajaratnam faces an uphill battle in bringing the issue before the 2nd. Latham discusses how second circuit broadened personal. On december 30, 2019, the united states court of appeals for the second circuit affirmed four insider trading guilty verdicts and, in doing so, forged an easier path to securing insider trading convictionsparticularly those against downstream tippees who may not personally know the. Aug 29, 2017 in doing so, the second circuit has signaled a substantial shift in insider trading law by reversing course from its 2014 decision, which made prosecuting insider trading cases more difficult. By rejecting the 2nd circuits pecuniary gain requirement and making clear that conduct like salmans falls squarely within the insidertrading laws, the court took an important step in its first ruling in an insidertrading case in two decades. The second circuit held that internal information of a government agency, not a private company, could support insider trading and other fraud prosecutions. There is the case of portfolio managers at deerfield management receiving information on medicare rates through an. The second circuit substantially expanded the scope of insidertrade liability in tipping cases and gave prosecutors a way around the. Dec 10, 2014 court overturns 2 insider trading convictions. The second circuit clears the path for insider trading convictions. Medicare insider trading case beset by flaws, 2nd circ.
Circuit court of appeals that overturned the convictions of accused insider traders todd newman and anthony chiasson was not from the securities and exchange commission. The ruling could send innocent men to prison and give prosecutors free reign to pad their resumes with new. By second circuit clarifies standards for insider trading claims the harvard law school forum on corporate governance accounting and small business beverly shares on wednesday, september 26, 2012 at 2. Key excerpts from the second circuit insidertrading. Second circuit holds that tippertippee liability can.
Sep 06, 2017 the 2nd circuit upheld mathew martomas insider trading conviction that resulted in a 9year prison term, the case may help clarify the fuzzy securities. An insider trading case heads to the supreme court. The uncertainty caused by ignoring precedent is especially severe for insider trading. The decision substantially expands the scope of insidertrade liability in tipping cases. Jul 02, 2018 on june 25, 2018, the second circuit amended its opinion in united states v. Second circuit upholds title 18 insidertrading conviction. Sec 2 for insider trading cases under section 10b of the securities exchange act title 15 securities fraud also applies to tipping.
On insider trading, there ought to be a law bloomberg. In this respect, a series of insider trading cases over the past five years in the second circuit, the ninth circuit and the u. Insidertrading prosecutions get easier with court ruling. Because of the december 30, 2019 decision of the second circuit court of appeals in united states v. Sec,1 the united states court of appeals for the second circuit affirmed an insider trading conviction without proof of a. Court of appeals for the second circuit heard argument in united states v. This post is based on a cleary gottlieb memorandum. Court of appeals for the second circuit s contro versial 2014 opinion in united states v. On december 30, 2019, the second circuit issued an opinion in.
Court of appeals for the second circuit may overhaul the way insider trading cases are charged and litigated in united states v. The second circuit decision held that an insidertrading case brought pursuant to certain federal criminal statutes does not require the. Second circuit upholds title 18 insider trading conviction where title 15 elements not established will prosecutors take advantage. Second circuit denies rehearing in key insider trading case. Second circuit potentially revives newmans meaningfully.
Circuit court of appeals voted 2to1 to let stand the 2014 conviction of mathew martoma. On december 30, 2019, the second circuit in united states v. And yet the second circuit took this simple, straightforward case and inexplicably used it to upend a previous insider trading case that had been. The second circuit s decision in newman emphasized that prosecutors must prove a tippee had knowledge of a personal benefit received by a corporate insider to find liability.
On august 23, 2017, the second circuit court of appeals affirmed the insider trading conviction of matthew martoma, a former portfolio manager for sac capital advisors llp sac capital. Recent insider trading cases in the us and canada may. The second circuit also decided not to upend the conviction of former goldman director rajat gupta in a related case in january. Sep, 2017 the second circuit rejected martomas argument, however, holding that an insider or tipper personally benefits from a disclosure of inside information whenever the information was disclosed with the expectation that the recipient would trade on it and the disclosure resembles trading by the insider followed by a gift of the profits to.
The securities and exchange commission, which pursues insider trading through civil charges, under a lower standard of proof, is limited to the narrower title 15 securities fraud statute. But the holding in newman shows that this is not always the case. After the second circuits decision in newman, whitman filed a petition under 28 u. News 2nd circuit upholds insider trading conviction of exgoldman sachs director the panels decision represented the latest retreat from the appellate courts holding in 2014s u. Blaszczak 1 on december 30, 2019 that could significantly affect the prosecution of criminal insider trading cases. Blaszczak potentially makes it easier to prosecute insider trading cases by ruling the government doesnt need to prove an insider received any. On august 23, 2017, the second circuit court of appeals affirmed the insider. Insider trading report missing key perspective, the accused. The second circuit said friday that it wont reconsider a ruling that made it easier to prosecute insider trading at hedge funds, despite arguments by an industry group that the ruling sends a. Appeal courts rush on insider trading decision will hurt.
Court of appeals for the second circuit overturned the. Second circuit clarifies standards for insider trading claims. Galleon insider trading case may go to 2nd circuit appeal. Following a fourweek trial in 2014, matthew martoma was convicted on several securities fraud charges in connection with an insider trading scheme. The second circuit loosens the reins on insider trading. The decision may also bolster the governments recent efforts to enforce insider trading laws in relation to political intelligence. Second circuit raises the bar in insider trading cases. On december 30, 2019, the majority of a second circuit panel affirmed insider trading convictions in united states v. There are big insider trading cases being decided right now in the 2nd circuit. While this new development is applicable only to criminal cases rather than to civil or enforcement actions, the second circuit has made it easier.
Ruling could lower bar for insider trading charges. And in affirming the use of these statutes to charge insider trading, the second circuit also held that when prosecuting cases using these statutes the government did not need to prove some of the elements it has to prove when it prosecutes insider trading. This is the third time in less than three years that a major court decision has. Martoma ii, the second circuit reinterpreted its precedent on the personal benefit element of insider trading, finding the element can be satisfied by proof of either a quid pro quo relationship or an insider s intention to benefit a recipient of inside information. In most cases, courts have had little difficulty defining the boundaries of that requirement because either the tipper received a financial benefit, or the tippee was a close friend or relative with whom the insider had no legitimate, business reason to be sharing. Second circuit holds that a personal benefit is not.
In doing so, the second circuit addressed the test to establish tippee liability for insider trading. A threejudge panel of the second circuit court of appeals rejected the plea in a 21 decision. Newman, saying prosecutors needed to show a tipper received a. Supreme court will hear a california insider trading case. Court of appeals for the second circuit issued an opinion in united states v. Blaszczak, a key insider trading decision issued by the court at the end of 2019. Securities insider trading cases get a prosecutorial boost. While the second circuit again upheld the insider trading conviction of former s.
Conviction upheld in biggest insider trading case in history. The governing regulatory language clarifies little. Court precedent when it concluded that an insider trading case can. Second circuit confirms easier path to insider trading convictions jan. The second circuit has implemented yet another significant change to insider trading law. Grappling with the uncertainties created by a line of cases following the u. Dirks, mentioned above, is a foundation of modern insider trading law.
Insider trading is the trading of a public companys stock or other securities such as bonds or stock options based on material, nonpublic information about the company. Insider trading is quasicommon law, arising from a vague statutory prohibition on any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance, 59. On april 10, 2020, the united states court of appeals for the second circuit denied the defendants petition for rehearing or rehearing. Martomas prosecution came near the climax of a longrunning insider trading investigation run by. Insider trading aficionados may remember that when judge sullivan was a trial judge in manhattan, the 2nd circuit found in 2016s u. Second circuit endorses new criminal theory for insider trading. The court also ruled that personal benefit is not required for an insider s conviction of securities fraud under title 18. In various countries, some kinds of trading based on insider information is illegal. The 2nd circuit has issued a landmark decision for insider trading enforcement that will make it significantly easier for the government to prosecute insider trading in criminal cases. News 2nd circuit upholds insider trading conviction of exgoldman sachs director the panels decision represented the latest retreat from the appellate courts holding in.
1486 1286 1070 981 1004 738 594 781 906 1570 740 462 1373 1292 339 377 1491 1029 1311 92 909 1140 1004 1401 1106 1142 650 654 641 420 1195 1019 550 14 529 1474 1345 1299 853 866 1393 515 859 1000